Google.com, one minute outside Google
In 2015, a researcher managed to buy google.com for one minute. This surprising story is often retold too quickly, yet it offers a useful reminder of how sensitive a domain name can be.
INSIGHTS
A surprising story, a striking figure, a dispute or a familiar misconception. Explore what each reveals about your business’s digital identity.
A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE
Famous names and surprising beginnings. What their stories can teach us.
In 2015, a researcher managed to buy google.com for one minute. This surprising story is often retold too quickly, yet it offers a useful reminder of how sensitive a domain name can be.
In 2000, Madonna secured the transfer of madonna.com. The lesson goes beyond “a celebrity gets her name back”.
The first .com did not belong to a search engine or an online shop. Its history is a useful reminder that a domain name and a website are different things.
LOOKING CLOSER
Understand a statistic, question an assumption or recognise a risk.
In the same year as Madonna, Sting sought the transfer of the domain matching his stage name. This time, the complaint was denied.
Television comes to mind immediately. Yet .tv is Tuvalu’s country-code extension. Two letters can have a different origin from the one we imagine.
A fraudulent website can use HTTPS too. Protecting a connection and establishing that a business deserves your trust are different questions.
A name can look familiar while being different. A substituted letter, an added word or a character from another alphabet may be enough to cause confusion.
WIPO reports a record caseload for 2025. It is a useful indicator, provided it is not mistaken for a count of all cybersquatting worldwide.
You type a domain name and no page appears. That does not tell you whether it is available, abandoned or for sale.