Our editorial method

A guide starts with a concrete question. What needs explaining? Which concepts might get mixed up? What deserves an explanation or an example?

That question guides the content. Depending on the subject, a comparison, a continuing example or a practical process may be more helpful than a long explanation. The structure follows what needs to be explained.

The idea is to help you get into a subject without needing to know its vocabulary already.

Guides include references you can consult: institutional publications, specialist documents, studies, research or economic analyses, depending on the subject.

Our editorial guidelines call for sources actually used in the content. They document the explanations and let you explore further if you wish. You should still be able to understand a guide without opening every link.

Context matters too. Who published the information? When? What exactly does it describe? An international study does not necessarily reflect the situation in Luxembourg. And several articles quoting the same study are not separate, independent confirmations.

Gathering information is a starting point. It then needs to be compared, its differences explained and its connections made clear.

That work turns scattered documents into an explanation you can follow. Examples and illustrations make concepts concrete. Definitions and a short glossary explain the vocabulary. The contents let you browse the subject or find the passage you need.

Where they add something useful, reference sheets and practical tools extend the reading experience. Every element should serve a purpose.

Artificial intelligence is one of the tools Wize uses. It can contribute to documentary research, organising information, analysis, synthesis, writing and improving explanations. Its contribution can be substantial, including in drafting the texts.

Its use follows Wize’s objectives and editorial guidelines: starting with a question, selecting relevant knowledge and building an accessible learning path.

These tools can also make mistakes, oversimplify or produce an inaccurate reference. Their use does not guarantee reliable content. Information, its context and its limitations still need attention.

Practices change, procedures evolve and new information appears. Publication and update dates help you place guides in time. They do not mean that every passage is continually rechecked.

A new reference or reader feedback may lead to an explanation being revised, a point being expanded or an error being corrected. We do not promise the same review schedule for all content.