wize.

GUIDE · BUILDING YOUR IDENTITY · PART 3

Check whether you can use and protect the name

A man seen from behind holding documents faces metal security gates with flags and indicator lights for different territories.

An available domain name does not establish that you can use or protect the name. Have your digital identity examined in relation to your activities, markets and existing rights.

By Wize12 min readPublished Updated
Listen

Tools

Summary sheet · Print
ShowHide

BEFORE YOU START

Has your favourite passed the right checks?

Your name works well when spoken. The people who tested it can write it down and find the intended address. You want to move on to the logo, website and signage. But what have you actually checked about the rights attached to that name?

Let us return to our bicycle repair workshop case study. Suppose Second Spin remains an option and the intended domain name is available. That answer helps with the address. You still need to look for names and trade marks that could prevent its use, then consider what the workshop could protect.

These checks can begin while you are testing how the name works in practice. Their purpose is to reveal, early enough, questions that could still change your choice.

YOUR PATH AT A GLANCE

Understand what your searches can establish

  • Separate registering an address, using a name and protecting it.
  • Define the activities and territories to examine.
  • Gather useful initial findings, then identify the questions that need analysis.

CHAPTER 1 OF 5

An available name — what answer have you received?

The expected result Understand which question each check answers.

“The name is free” can mean very different things. Before relying on that statement, establish who gave it, what it concerns and which search it follows.

Three separate questions
Your questionWhat you are trying to establish
Can I register this address?The technical availability of the intended domain name under the rules of its extension.
Can I use this name for my activity?Existing rights that could prevent the intended uses.
Can I protect this name as a trade mark?Its eligibility for registration and the protection relevant to your goods, services and markets.

For .lu, DNS Luxembourg explains that registration alone does not confer a right to use the name. Applicants must check for possible conflicts with third-party rights. An available address therefore does not validate the business name.

The name availability certificate issued by Luxembourg Business Registers answers another question. It compares the requested company name with those of entities already entered in the Trade and Companies Register, or RCS. A certificate showing the name as available does not reserve it or replace a trade mark search.

Sources: [1] [2]

CHAPTER 2 OF 5

Define what you will do, and where

The expected result Describe the relevant scope before opening the registers.

A word cannot be assessed in isolation. It needs to be considered in relation to the goods and services concerned and the territories in which rights may have effect.

For our workshop, “cycling activity” is too vague. Will it repair bicycles, sell second-hand models, offer rentals or organise rides? Describe the launch offer and any developments already being prepared. This gives meaning to the results you encounter.

Trade mark goods and services are grouped into categories called classes. These help organise applications and searches. Start by describing your activity precisely in ordinary language. Choosing the wording and understanding its scope require more than a class number.

There is no national trade mark filing limited to Luxembourg alone. A Benelux trade mark covers all three countries. The appropriate protection depends on your activities and intended markets.

A website being accessible abroad does not mean that your project targets every country. Specify where you intend to sell, deliver, provide services or communicate with customers. A local repair service in Luxembourg and planned bicycle sales into neighbouring countries call for different working scopes.

Sources: [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

CHAPTER 3 OF 5

Look beyond the exact name

The expected result Gather documented findings, including similarities and context.

Start with the name as you intend to use it. Then search for variants that remain similar in spelling, sound or meaning. An exact search is a first step. A spelling difference is not enough to end the examination.

For Second Spin, you could search the complete expression, then variations in spacing or plural forms. The languages of the project may reveal further similarities to consider. The aim is to identify what a search limited to the exact name could miss.

Consult the Benelux trade marks register and other relevant tools for your geographical scope. TMview brings together data from participating offices and supports broader searches. Check which offices are covered and open the detailed records of useful results.

For each result worth examining, record the name and any graphic elements, holder, goods and services, territory, status and dates. A pending application and a registered trade mark need to be read differently. Keep the link and access date so you can retrieve what you saw.

Add company registers and visible uses in search engines, directories, websites and signage. The rights to examine are not limited to registered trade marks. A trade name, company name or domain name in use may also be relevant.

Imagine a search around Second Spin reveals a pending trade mark application for a similar name. Here is how you could read the record and prepare questions for further examination.

Reading a trade mark record — a hypothetical example
What you readIn this exampleWhat to examine
Name and presentationA name similar to Second SpinIdentify the similarities in writing, sound or meaning. Keep the logo too if it forms part of the application.
Goods and servicesBicycle repair and maintenanceCompare the listed services with those your workshop will offer. Do not stop at the class number.
TerritoryThe BeneluxThis includes Luxembourg, so the result concerns an area covered by your project.
StatusA pending applicationRecord the indicated stage and access date. An application is not yet a registration.
Applicant and datesThe applicant and dates shown in the recordKeep these details with the link and application reference for examination.

This would reveal similarities in name, activity and territory that need assessment. It would not, on its own, establish that you must abandon Second Spin. Conversely, a different activity or the absence of an identical name would not automatically establish that every use is possible.

Sources: [9] [3] [10] [11] [12] [13]

CHAPTER 4 OF 5

Examine what you want to protect

The expected result Separate obstacles in the name itself from other people’s rights.

Using a name and filing it as a trade mark are separate decisions. Filing is not a compulsory formality for every business choosing a trade name. It serves a protection objective that should be assessed for the project. Deciding against filing does not remove the need to examine other people’s rights in the name you intend to use.

A name may suit you without being eligible for trade mark registration. In particular, it must allow the public to recognise your business’s goods or services and distinguish them from those of others. This is called distinctiveness. A name that simply describes the relevant activity or goods may be refused registration.

For our workshop, an expression such as “Bicycle repairs” directly explains the service. That clarity may help customers, but it does not make the expression eligible for protection as a word mark. Conversely, inventing a word does not prove availability. It may still resemble an earlier trade mark.

Specify what you want to protect, whether the name in ordinary characters, a logo or a combination. Filing a graphic combination does not establish that the words alone receive the same scope of protection. The application should match what you intend to use and defend.

In the Benelux procedure, the office examines, among other things, whether the trade mark meets registration requirements. Earlier trade marks raise a separate question and may be relied on by their holders in an opposition. Passing one procedural stage does not replace your preliminary work on existing rights.

Sources: [3] [14] [8]

CHAPTER 5 OF 5

Turn searches into decisions

The expected result Identify what is established, what remains open and what must be resolved.

After the searches, you should be able to distinguish what you know, what remains uncertain and what conditions the next steps. Organise your findings around these three questions.

Three points for preparing the decision
Your point of referenceWhat to record
What is establishedSearches performed, dated findings and documents obtained, with their scope.
What remains openSimilar names to assess, territories or uses not covered and searches still required.
What must be resolved before proceedingThe answer needed before a public announcement, a sign order or other spending that is difficult to change.

For the workshop, a similar name found in the Benelux would become a specific question to resolve before confirming the sign. The information gathered helps focus the assessment.

If you receive a refusal, opposition or demand to stop using the name, keep the complete document and its receipt date. Have the applicable procedure and deadline identified before responding.

When an obstacle is confirmed, compare the possible responses and their consequences for the project. That is the subject of the next article.

Sources: [13]

KEY POINTS

What to remember

  • An available domain and an available company name in the RCS do not establish that the name can be used and protected.
  • Searches take their meaning from your goods, services, markets and intended uses.
  • Similar names and existing uses matter too. No exact result does not close the search.
  • Trade mark filing serves a protection objective. Using the name and respecting others’ rights remain separate questions.
  • Keep dated findings and clarify what still needs examination before major commitments.
Mini-glossary
TermDefinition
Earlier rightAn existing right potentially relevant to the intended name and uses.
DistinctivenessThe ability of a name, logo or combination to distinguish one business’s goods or services from those of others.
ClassA category in the classification of goods and services used for trade marks.
Word markA trade mark consisting of words, letters or numbers in ordinary characters rather than a particular graphic presentation.
OppositionA procedure in which a third party relies on an earlier right to challenge a trade mark application.
Sources and method

The explanations draw on official sources consulted on 6 November 2026. The preparation tables and working questions are proposed by Wize. The bicycle workshop is a case study. No availability or eligibility for protection has been established for the names cited. The Belgian source describes the common Benelux system. INPI resources explain search principles without transferring French procedures to Luxembourg. No indicative filing fees or deadlines are reproduced. Some official sources are in French.

  1. DNS Luxembourg — General principles

    Applicant responsibility, domain registration and name-use rights. French official resource.

  2. Guichet.lu — Company name availability

    Comparison of company names in the RCS. An available-name certificate does not reserve the name. French official resource.

  3. Belgian FPS Economy — Before filing a trade mark

    Goods, services, classes, the choice whether to file and earlier-right searches in the common Benelux system. French official resource.

  4. EUIPO — EU trade mark basic questions

    Territorial scope of an EU trade mark. Official search index checked; direct reading was technically restricted.

  5. INPI — Filing a trade mark

    French national trade mark applications. French official resource.

  6. WIPO — Madrid System

    Applications for designated members. Each office decides on protection. No automatic worldwide protection.

  7. USPTO — Trademark basics

    US office and federal trade mark registration. Official English resource.

  8. Guichet.lu — Registered trade mark

    Forms of trade marks and the absence of a national filing limited to Luxembourg. Older page; its fees and deadlines are not reproduced. French official resource.

  9. INPI — Searching for a trade mark

    Exact search as a first step and further searches for similarity in spelling, sound and meaning. French procedure is not transferred to Luxembourg. French official resource.

  10. EUIPO — Searching availability

    Trade mark search tools, including TMview. Official index checked; the direct page returned an access restriction.

  11. BOIP — Trade marks register

    Interactive official search tool. No search establishing availability of the case-study name was performed.

  12. TMview — Trade mark search

    Search tool covering participating offices. No case-study name search result is presented.

  13. INPI — Trade mark validity conditions

    Availability, earlier rights and interpreting results, including specialist assistance. General principles. French official resource.

  14. Belgian FPS Economy — Benelux filing

    Distinctiveness, descriptive names and opposition based on earlier rights. No fees or deadlines reproduced. French official resource.

Something to clarify? Suggest a correction.